immm
07-18 03:35 PM
This is purely my opinion and may not be the best legal advice. If I were in the same situation, I would go by the EB type (EB2 first) and then by the priority dates. Whichever one is higher, I would apply both in that classification. If both I-140's are EB3 and same priority dates, I would go with the one with better job security (stable employer and job) and keep the other I-140 as backup. In this day and age of corporate acquisitions, mergers and bankruptcies and USCIS backlogs, you want to use the option with the least risk.
wallpaper New Women Straight Hairstyle
Rune
April 25th, 2004, 12:12 PM
Have you consulted Rob's CF speed database? http://robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007
Blog Feeds
08-19 05:30 PM
The Wall Street Journal reports that DHS will "intensify" its enforcement efforts against employers around the US: John Morton, the new chief of U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, a unit of the Department of Homeland Security, said that the agency is set to increase the number of companies it will audit and systematically impose fines on violators. Violations could also lead to criminal charges, he said. *** "You are going to see audits regularly and on a larger scale," Mr. Morton said during a two-day visit to southern California, his first since being appointed four months ago. "You will see...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/dhs-set-to-increase-number-of-employer-audits.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/dhs-set-to-increase-number-of-employer-audits.html)
2011 Hairstyle 2011. New Women
immique
06-23 05:59 PM
Sorry for posting this question again. but since I did not get an answer, I am posting again to see if some one can advise regarding this. I am trying to look up dates for H1 visa stamping in Canada and the website says no appointments for 6 weeks. I am thinking of going for visa stamping in July. is there any chance that they might open up some more appointments in the next few days even though it says unavailable currently? please post your comments and experiences regarding this.
more...
redddiv
06-14 03:55 PM
try www.gowda.com
good experience for me.
good experience for me.
gesfox
03-26 10:30 PM
very nice... well done fai.
more...
kirupa
07-13 03:39 AM
Added! :)
2010 girlfriend new long hairstyles
davidmaria
06-25 02:55 PM
Is there any way to know if 140 revoked after approval.is there any change in LUD ?
more...
Scythe
10-15 07:37 PM
I'm sure some poor forum member had that idea and now isn't gonna submit it because of this :grin:
They probably thought they'd win too.
They probably thought they'd win too.
hair New Women Hairstyles
Blog Feeds
07-25 05:40 PM
The Arizona Republic discusses the intriguing question of what happens if Immigration and Customs Enforcement simply says no thanks when Arizona police call them: Arizona's tough new immigration law is slated to take effect Thursday, but the nation's immigration enforcement agency has not indicated whether it will cooperate with police who are trying to enforce it. Without cooperation from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, much of the law would become unenforceable: Police would have no way of determining, from federal authorities, the legal status of suspected illegal immigrants as the state law requires. And that would severely hamper efforts to arrest...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/07/what-if-ice-refuses-to-cooperate.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/07/what-if-ice-refuses-to-cooperate.html)
more...
Blog Feeds
09-11 12:00 PM
Sorry, that revelation just made my head explode. The "You Lie!" Congressman claims to have been an immigration lawyer before going to Congress. I'm working on whether that is true or has the same truthiness as the illegal aliens in the health care bill myth.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/wilson-claims-to-have-been-an-immigration-lawyer-in-the-past-no.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/wilson-claims-to-have-been-an-immigration-lawyer-in-the-past-no.html)
hot Short hairstyles worn by women
harrydr
10-04 11:38 PM
Hello members at IV,
Just wanted to know what does it mean when other members state that their case is EB2 I, EB2 ROW, so on and so forth. How can i find out what is my case filed to? Thanks in advance.
Just wanted to know what does it mean when other members state that their case is EB2 I, EB2 ROW, so on and so forth. How can i find out what is my case filed to? Thanks in advance.
more...
house new women hairstyles.
sxk
10-19 03:16 AM
I am looking for a good immigration lawyer based out of chicago. I had some questions and thought I will call and talk to a lawyer. If anybody knows of any lawyer who is not expensive and is good, please let me know
Thanks is advance
SK
Thanks is advance
SK
tattoo new hairstyles 2011 for women.
ivgclive
09-21 12:25 PM
D
more...
pictures new hairstyles for women 2011
kedrex
04-07 07:43 AM
Dont go by these dates - they are only processing dates. Go to this website for scheduling appointments:
https://www.nvars.com/Production/userhome.aspx
You can only schedule appointments 6 weeks in advance.
By the way, does anyone know the approximate time daily that these appointment slots open up. I remember this used to be around 6am a couple of years back.
https://www.nvars.com/Production/userhome.aspx
You can only schedule appointments 6 weeks in advance.
By the way, does anyone know the approximate time daily that these appointment slots open up. I remember this used to be around 6am a couple of years back.
dresses New Women Short Hairstyles
GCBy3000
06-09 10:14 AM
We have to have a seperate thread for new members right in the home page section along with other important links.
Also if the new members find some time to go through the website mosf of their doubts will get cleared.
Also if the new members find some time to go through the website mosf of their doubts will get cleared.
more...
makeup New Paris Hilton Hairstyles
needgreen
05-27 04:17 PM
Does anyone know if EAD renewal requires an employment at the time of renewal? My I140 have been approved and I485 pending for long time under EB2-NIW. Also, do I loose legal status to stay in USA if I lost employment while my I485 pending. Again, my GC application is not company sponsored, it was all by myself. Do I stay in right status even I become unemployed while my I485 pending. My I485 will be pending for few more years due to retrogession. So I am wondering if I can stay as unemployed for a period of time while my AOS pending.
Also, do I need to have an employment while re-entering using AP? I recently used my EP to re-enter but no question was asked about employment. I am thinking if I can use AP for re-entry if I travel outside while I am unemployed. I have to think about all this options as chaotic situation is going on the company and layoff might be inevitable.
Please please reply. Thanks a lot!
Also, do I need to have an employment while re-entering using AP? I recently used my EP to re-enter but no question was asked about employment. I am thinking if I can use AP for re-entry if I travel outside while I am unemployed. I have to think about all this options as chaotic situation is going on the company and layoff might be inevitable.
Please please reply. Thanks a lot!
girlfriend hairstyles women office 01
roseball
04-21 05:09 PM
My friend and his wife re-entered US on AP a couple of weeks ago....They were paroled into US till Apr 2009. Their APs are valid till Oct 2008. Now his wife needs to go back to her home country immediately for a while (not sure how long due to family emergency).... If she doesn't plan to return before her current AP expires, what are her options to re-enter. My friend is still on H1 status valid till 2010, no H1/H4 visa stamps.....If she intends to stay home longer, can she re-enter US on a H4 visa after getting it stamped...If she plans to return before her current AP expires, say in Sep 2008, is it safe to use AP because she will be out of the country for 5 months if she leaves now and we are not sure if someone can stay out of US for that long and re-enter on AP.....Any suggestions...His PD is April 2004 EB-3 India
hairstyles you got a new hairstyle!
fedekorcho
09-29 12:57 PM
Hi i've been reading the forum for a while now and I hope that you guys can help me out. Like most people i have more questions than answers.
I just got my i140 approved (Sept 24,2008 or so).
The LC was file around Apr/Jun '07 so i would assume this is the Priority date correct?
My lawyer tells me that while this is great, we still have to wait for visa numbers to become available to file the 485. Any suggestions on when is this gonna happen?
I know that this is somewhat linked to the visa bulletin ... how should i read it to understand in a few words, when is my time?
Once i've filed i485 how long does USCIS takes to process it?
On the other hand, i'm quite anxious about changing jobs. If I do, do I waste all this time invested in the process? any other way around that?
It seems like no lawyer wants to provide a straight enough answer. I know it's a lot of questions but i really appreciate it.
THANX A LOT!
I just got my i140 approved (Sept 24,2008 or so).
The LC was file around Apr/Jun '07 so i would assume this is the Priority date correct?
My lawyer tells me that while this is great, we still have to wait for visa numbers to become available to file the 485. Any suggestions on when is this gonna happen?
I know that this is somewhat linked to the visa bulletin ... how should i read it to understand in a few words, when is my time?
Once i've filed i485 how long does USCIS takes to process it?
On the other hand, i'm quite anxious about changing jobs. If I do, do I waste all this time invested in the process? any other way around that?
It seems like no lawyer wants to provide a straight enough answer. I know it's a lot of questions but i really appreciate it.
THANX A LOT!
Macaca
03-18 07:25 AM
Some paras from Congress's Oversight Offensive (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/16/AR2007031601989.html), By David S. Broder (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/david+s.+broder/), Sunday, March 18, 2007
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
CADude
08-23 01:44 PM
NO it's RIRO [Random In Random Out] process.
Lots of July 2nd filer are waiting.. So have faith and more wait..:)
I guess USCIS is sending Receipt Notes according to priority dates meaning with 2006-7 priority dates will get receipts later.
My 485 reached on 2nd july...No Update yet.
Can I ask any one get RN with priority date later than 2006?
Lots of July 2nd filer are waiting.. So have faith and more wait..:)
I guess USCIS is sending Receipt Notes according to priority dates meaning with 2006-7 priority dates will get receipts later.
My 485 reached on 2nd july...No Update yet.
Can I ask any one get RN with priority date later than 2006?
No comments:
Post a Comment